Leer este artículo en español →
If you've ever opened ChatGPT, typed "write the About page for my Italian restaurant," and immediately felt something clench in your stomach when the output came back, you already know the answer to half of this post. The copy was fine. It was also the exact same copy every other Italian restaurant owner has been staring at on their screen for two years now, with minor word swaps. You could feel, without being able to articulate it, that the output could be any restaurant. That’s the problem.
But the full answer is more useful than "AI can’t write a restaurant website." It absolutely can write parts of one, fast and well. The trick is knowing which parts, how to brief it, and where to stop — because the parts of your website that make guests choose you instead of the place across the street are exactly the parts AI is worst at writing unprompted.
Let me show you what I mean with the same prompt, three different levels of effort.
Generic first pass
Our authentic Italian dining experience brings the flavors of Italy to your neighborhood. Experience hospitality and tradition at our family-owned restaurant, where every dish is prepared with care.
Prompt: “Write an About page intro for an Italian restaurant.” · Reads like five hundred other restaurant websites.
Lightly prompted
A neighborhood trattoria in the heart of Silver Spring, serving handmade pasta daily and the wood-fired pizzas we’ve perfected over fifteen years.
Prompt includes location, concept, and tenure. Better — but still reads like a well-written brochure.
Natively written
Every Sunday since 1998, Nonna has made the same red sauce. Eight hours, no shortcuts, no negotiation. It’s on every pasta dish we serve, because changing it would be a fight none of us would win.
Written by a human who knows the place. Same info, entirely different register. Specific, true, unmistakably yours.
All three are grammatical. All three would "pass" an editor's review. Only one of them makes a guest want to eat there.
Where AI is genuinely good for a restaurant website
I am not an AI skeptic. I use ChatGPT every day. It has real, durable use cases for an independent restaurant operator who is also trying to do their own website work at eleven p.m. on a Tuesday. Three of them specifically:
1. Menu item descriptions at scale
If you've got a fifty-item menu and no time, AI is very good at turning a one-line internal prep note ("brick chicken, lemon, rosemary, served over potato") into a two-sentence guest-facing description. That’s genuinely useful. It replaces the "same dish name with no description" default most restaurant sites ship with.
The key is the prompt has to include your voice samples. Give ChatGPT three menu items that are already written the way you want, then ask it to match that register for the rest. Without the voice samples, you get the stage-1 output above, applied fifty times.
“Our succulent brick chicken is expertly prepared with fresh lemon and aromatic rosemary, served over a bed of perfectly seasoned potato.”
“Half a chicken, pressed flat under a brick so the skin crisps the way it should. Lemon, rosemary, on the potatoes.”
2. Draft copy for pages the guest won’t actually read carefully
Not every page on your website is load-bearing. Your Privacy Policy is not closing reservations. Your Allergen Information page is not changing a guest's mind. For compliance-flavored pages that just need to exist and be competent, AI is fine. Ship it, move on.
3. Structure and outlining
AI is genuinely better than most humans at outlining. Ask ChatGPT "what sections does a restaurant About page typically have, ranked by how much they affect a guest’s decision to book," and you’ll get a useful framework in thirty seconds. Use the outline. Write the actual words yourself.
Where AI gets your restaurant quietly wrong
1. The specifics that make guests trust you
Restaurant websites work or don’t on specifics. "We source from a farm in Poolesville" is worth ten sentences about "locally sourced ingredients." "Our pastry chef trained at Del Posto" is worth a paragraph about "our talented team." AI, unprompted, defaults to the general because the general is what’s in its training data. Guests trust the specific because the specific is the opposite of a template.
2. Your cadence
Every restaurant that’s written its own copy has a cadence — how long the sentences run, where the em-dashes fall, what register the voice sits in. AI flattens that within the first paragraph. You can brief it to fix this, but most operators don’t, because briefing the AI properly takes about the same amount of time as just writing the thing.
3. The moments that require judgment
The hardest part of writing restaurant copy isn’t finding words — it’s knowing which three things to say in a four-sentence paragraph and which seven not to. That’s judgment, and judgment is exactly what a language model can’t do. It doesn’t know that the story about opening during the first winter of the pandemic is the one that sells the room, and that the story about the soft opening menu change three years later isn’t. You know that. You’re the one who has to type it.
The parts of a restaurant website that make guests choose you are precisely the parts an AI is worst at writing. Which means the time you save with ChatGPT has to be reinvested somewhere, or the site gets flatter, not faster.
Want someone to look at your site’s AI-written pages honestly?
On a 20-minute call I’ll pull your current About / Menu / Story pages, flag the specific paragraphs that read as AI-generated, and show you the two or three moves that turn them back into your voice. Free for independent operators.
Email DonChatGPT can write your restaurant's website. It can't decide which parts of you make it onto the page. That's still your job.
The one-page briefing that fixes it
If you’re going to use AI for your restaurant copy — and you should — you need to give it something other than "write my About page." Here’s the briefing template I use when I’m working with operators who want to handle their own content. Write this once, save it in a Google Doc, paste it as the first prompt every time you open a new ChatGPT conversation.
-
1
The restaurant, in one sentence
-
2
Three real specifics
-
3
Three voice samples
-
4
Three words it must never say
-
5
The task, narrow
- The restaurant, in one sentence. Neighborhood, cuisine, years open, one distinctive detail. “A twelve-year-old Italian place in Takoma Park known for its Sunday red sauce.” One sentence.
- Three real specifics. The farm you source from, the chef’s background, the one dish guests ask about most. Specific nouns, specific people, specific places. These are what AI otherwise refuses to invent (rightly).
- Three voice samples. Three short paragraphs already written the way you want to sound. Your best Instagram caption, your best menu description, your best email to your regulars. AI is a mimic; give it something real to mimic.
- Three things you never want it to say. “Authentic,” “passionate,” “elevated” — the words every restaurant copy default defaults to. Ban them explicitly.
- The task, narrow. Don’t say “write my About page.” Say “write a 150-word intro paragraph for the About page that mentions the Sunday red sauce and ends with a line that makes a new guest want to book this weekend.”
With that briefing in place, AI goes from giving you stage-1 output to giving you something closer to stage-2. It won’t reach stage-3 — the native voice, the part that feels like only your restaurant could have written this — but it’ll get you 70% of the way there. Your job is the last 30%: adding the one specific detail the AI didn’t know, cutting the sentence that reads a little too brochure-y, swapping a generic adjective for a concrete noun.
So… should it?
| Page or task | Use AI? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Menu item descriptions | Yes | Sensory adjectives + provenance language are AI's sweet spot — it's read 10K menus. |
| Alt text for photos | Yes | Boring, repetitive, accessibility-critical — exactly what AI does well. |
| FAQ schema content | Yes (with editing) | Generate 12 questions, prune to 6, rewrite the answers in your voice. |
| Privacy / accessibility / terms | Yes | Compliance copy is generic on purpose. AI is fine. |
| Blog posts (recipes, neighborhood) | Hesitantly | Useful as outline + first draft; the voice is the editing pass. |
| Homepage hero copy | No | The 12 words that decide tonight's reservation. Write them yourself. |
| About / story page | No | This is the page guests share to convince friends. AI can't fake earned voice. |
| Hyperlocal / neighborhood claims | No | AI confidently invents restaurants that don't exist 4 blocks from you. |
Yes, for menu descriptions, outlines, and compliance copy. Hesitantly, for first drafts of pages you’ll heavily edit. No, for the three pages that actually close a guest: your homepage hero, your About story, and the one-line reason someone should pick your restaurant over the identical-looking one four blocks away.
Those three, you write. Even if it takes you a weekend. Even if the first draft is bad. Because a weekend of bad sentences written by the person who owns the restaurant will always beat a polished AI draft written by no-one in particular. That’s not sentimentality — it’s a conversion point. Guests can feel the difference between “someone who cares about this place wrote this” and “something that didn’t care about anything wrote this.” The conversion difference between the two is measurable, and not small.
ChatGPT is a power tool. It’s very good at moving heavy things across the room. It is not a carpenter. Use it for what it’s for, and keep the judgment work — the voice, the specifics, the moments that make a restaurant feel like a place and not a business — for yourself.
Or hire a carpenter.